Where it comes from
The term comes from the lean startup world - Eric Ries discusses the principle throughout The Lean Startup as part of the build-measure-learn loop. The concierge test takes the “build the minimum to learn” idea to its logical extreme: what if the minimum is a human doing the job, not software at all? The classic example is Food on the Table, an early startup that built a meal planning and grocery app. Before writing any code, the founders manually created personalised meal plans and grocery lists for one family each week. They delivered real value. They learned what mattered. Then they built.What you’re testing
The concierge test answers one question: if we delivered this value manually, would customers find it valuable enough to keep using it? It doesn’t test scalability, automation, or UX. It tests the core value proposition in its rawest form. If customers don’t find it valuable when a human delivers it personally and attentively, software won’t fix that 😬When to use it
Concierge tests work best when:- The product involves a service or recommendation (curation, matching, personalisation)
- You’re unsure whether customers actually want the outcome you’re promising
- You want to learn deeply about the job before automating it
- You need to validate willingness to pay before committing to a build
How to run one
- Pick one customer - ideally someone who has the problem acutely. Don’t try to scale this yet.
- Deliver the value manually - do whatever the product would eventually do, by hand. Email them results. Message them on WhatsApp. Use a spreadsheet.
- Observe and ask - Did they use what you sent? Did it change their behaviour? What was missing? What did they ignore?
- Decide - Is the value real? Is there a path to automating this in a way customers would still find valuable?